Tag: e-books

J.D. Salinger’s Novels Will Finally be Released as E-Books

It comes as no surprise to book lovers that author J.D. Salinger would be adverse to publishing his novels electronically. His personal beliefs come out in his novels. If you even mentioned the idea of reading a book on a computer to Holden Caulfield, he would have had a conniption.

Salinger stayed away from the press as his literary fame grew, but was very open about his dislike of books changing during the digital age. However, this week, his son, Matt Salinger announced that his four published novel would in fact be available for the first time in e-book form.

 

books written by JD Salinger

Image via Penguin Books

 

After Salinger died in 2010, his son has been overseeing the J.D. Salinger Literary Trust and making every decision with his legendary father in mind. Despite his father’s aversion to advancing technology, he said “There were few things my father loved more than the full tactile experience of reading a printed book, but he may have loved his readers more — and not just the ‘ideal private reader’ he wrote about, but all his readers.”

 

 

Especially when thinking of readers with disability, Matt Salinger knew he was making the right decision. Starting Tuesday, Salinger’s long-time publisher, Little, Brown and Company, will release all of Salinger’s books electronically. Now even more people can be exposed to Salinger’s iconic works: The Catcher in the Rye, Nine Stories, Raise High the Roof Beam, Carpenters and Seymour: An Introduction  and Franny and Zooey.

 

JD Salinger

Image via The Irish Times

 

Salinger’s son also hinted at his father’s unpublished manuscripts that he hopes to publish in the future. Be on the lookout, literary fans, Salinger’s posthumous releases may just give us the next great literary character (so we can finally all stop quoting Holden for once).

 

 

Featured Image via Variety 

Macmillan Reconsiders its Library E-Book Policy

Some book publishers are rethinking the way they distribute their e-books to public libraries. Thanks to the convention of digital-book borrowing apps, many readers are able to read new titles on their tablets without having to wait for a physical book to be returned. This is especially relevant when big releases such as Michael Wolff’s Fire and Fury and James Comey’s A Higher Loyalty are in popular demand. Readers flocked to these books the second that they hit the shelves, so digital book-borrowing apps became extremely convenient for those that wanted to rent the book without having to wait.

However, Macmillan, who published both Wolff and Comey’s books, are not as thrilled. With such widespread access to their most popular books, the company believes that they’re losing potential sales.

“Library reads are currently 45% of our total digital book reads in the U.S. and growing,” Macmillan Chief Executive John Sargent told The Wall Street Journal. “They are cannibalizing our digital sales.”

 

 

It is for this reason that Macmillan plans to limit each library system’s access to one digital copy of each new book it publishes in the first eight weeks of the book’s release. The action is set to take place on November 1st, and the hope is that more people will be inclined to purchase new books, instead of easily renting them.

 

Image via Google Play

 

Steve Potash, chief executive of Rakuten OverDrive, a digital distributor of e-books, replied to Macmillan’s move: “It will create a backlash against Macmillan books and their authors. Libraries encourage and showcase authors to readers. Now libraries will have a hard time doing that for Macmillan.”

Whether the decision to rubberneck e-book copies is fruitful or not is yet to be seen. However, for those of you digital-book borrowers out there, be prepared to wait for Macmillan’s new releasesor at least be prepared to fork over the money to buy a copy for yourself.

 

 

 

Featured Image Via Engadget

Print Vs E-Books: New Study Proves Which Is Better For Kids

The Print versus E-book debate is the hot new topic nowadays. Finally we have an answer to which is the better of the two, for children at least.

The new study from the University of Michigan was shared in the American Academy of Pediatrics earlier in March 2019.  Tiffany G. Munzer M.D., Fellow in Developmental Behavior Pediatrics says:

 

“We wanted to conduct this study because shared book reading is one of the most important developmental activities families can engage in. It promotes a love of reading, early childhood literacy, and attachment between trusted caregivers and their children”

 

Related image

Dr. Tiffany G. Munzer | Image via Pediatrics – AAP Gateway 

 

For the study thirty-seven healthy parent-toddler pairs were gathered to read three book formats: enhanced electronic, with sound effects and/or animation; basic electronic; and print. The reading was recorded for each book read, and what the researchers were looking for was bond building, verbal communication, and connection to the reading itself between the parent and child.

 

Unfortunately for tablet and E-reader fanatics, the results were not in favor for electronic books whatsoever.

 

The gist of the results are that with E-books overall, the bonds between parent and child, the connection and focus on the story being told, and even the speed in which a book is read are all lessened.

 

Related image

Image via raisesmartkid.com

 

The researchers believed this was due in part to the special features that E-books have over print books being too distracting for toddlers. Tiffany G. Munzer M.D. noted:

[T]he enhancements in electronic books interfere with reading comprehension, and parents verbalize less overall on electronic books compared with print…Toddlers [are at] an important developmental age…because of their immature attention capacity, which might make them more susceptible to these distracting enhancements.

 

Most of the time during the study, parents would have to stop reading because their child pushed the wrong button, or tapped the touchscreen incorrectly.

 

Maybe this is because toddlers are new to E-book technology, but if you think about it, toddlers are new to just about everything aside from eating, pooping, napping, and crying. Just a thought.

 

Related image

Image via Tenor

 

Overall the results found that print books gave parents and toddlers a much better bonding experience where the child wasn’t distracted by any special graphics or lights. The pairs more often shared questions and comments for a discussion on what they were reading as well.

 

Image result for parent and toddler reading

Image via Dyslexia Association of Ireland

 

In an interview with ABC News Tamba Bay Munzer proclaimed, “The print book is really the gold standard in eliciting positive interactions between parents and their children.”In the post for American Academy of Pediatrics, Munzer also recommended that “pediatricians may wish to continue recommending print books over electronic books for toddlers and their parents.”

 

In the end print books win this battle, but the war continues.

 

Related image

Image via Acorn House International

 

 

Featured Image via The School Run

eReader vs Books

Studies Show Almost Everyone Prefers Reading on Paper, Not Screens

What if I told you that despite the popular belief that children are more likely to read on a device like an iPad or a Kindle, research shows that this isn’t necessarily true.

 

The study showed that children in Years 4 and 6 who had consistent access to devices that could be used as eReaders didn’t typically use these devices to read, even if they were reading books daily. The study also showed that the more devices the children had access to, the less they read overall. This suggests that electronic reading devices can actually hinder reading in children. 

 

A previous study showed similar results in teenagers; some students enjoyed reading books on electronic devices, but most of the students did not use their devices for this purpose. The study showed the teenagers reading the highest quantity of books at the highest frequency did not read on a screen.

 

Via Giphy

Via Giphy

 

Education writer Marc Prensky first coined the term “digital natives”, characterizing a whole generation of children with “high digital literacy and a uniform preference for screen-based reading.” The issue within this mindset is the same with standardized testing – not all children have the same skills and abilities. 

 

The misconception grew, impacting decisions for schools and public libraries not only in the United States. Some libraries have removed all paper books as a response, while more and more schools, from elementary to college levels, are increasing their use of digital resources. 

 

For me, the reasons why reading on a screen is less ideal than reading from a printed book are numerous. I’m easily distracted on a screen. I like the feel of flipping pages. Notifications from everyone make it hard to keep track of where I am. Books just feel great in your hands. I could go on, but I think you get the point.

 

With both children and teenagers proven to read better on printed books, it’s only a matter of time before it’s scientifically proven that everyone prefers a book to an eReader. So let’s come together as a society and stop focusing so hard on eReaders and start focusing back on print. Right? 

 

Featured Image Via Good e-Reader. 

e-book feature

E-longated Waits for E-Books at Your Library? Here’s Why.

You go to your library to check out Celeste Ng’s Little Fires Everywhere because everybody and their mother and their mother’s mother is talking about it. The librarian tells you the physical copy is out and isn’t due back for another three weeks. Hey, you have an iPad! You decide you’ll just take out the e-book. Libraries let you do that now, in 2017. Um, what. You’ve been WAITLISTED!? How do you get waitlisted for an e-book? It possesses no physical space!

 

The thing is the publishers. Many have a policy where they only allow libraries to lend one e-book at a time, although services like OverDrive do allow some books to be lent out multiple times. At my local library, for example, If I want to take out John Green’s newest book Turtles All the Way Down, there are sixteen e-books available, but each one has seven people waiting for it. It would probably take most people a week or two to finish it, so I’d have to wait between forty-nine to ninety-eight days to read the new book. He’ll probably have another book out at that point (just kidding).

 

Take a step back, though. Those sixteen copies I mentioned are not just my library, but my whole country. So the county shares only sixteen copies of one of October’s biggest books. Why so few? Because libraries are often charged between $100 to $200 per copy. That means my county paid between $1,600 to $3,200 for sixteen copies of a single book.

 

via GIPHY

 

The publisher’s logic for pricing e-books this way is that multiple people share it, and e-books won’t wear out the way physical copies do. It makes sense in a way, but it seems odd for a library to pay $72 for one copy of Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehisi Coates, while someone on Amazon can buy their own copy for $9.99.

 

Because libraries have to pay so much for a single copy of an e-book, they’ve began teaming up with other libraries to gather a proper e-book catalogue. The problem is this makes waitlist times way worse because people are now competing with people from far away to read an e-book.

 

It’s an issue for taxpayers too, since they are paying for these exorbitantly priced e-books. To be fair, though, consumers do tend to think e-books are cheaper to make than they really are. A lot of the costly aspects of producing physical books have to do with workforce, workspace, design, and general administrative costs–not the cost of paper. That overhead isn’t avoided when making e-books. They’re still expensive to make.

 

Still, publishers seem to be getting greedy when it comes to libraries. Anyway, next time you have to wait for an e-book, which is basically a totally nonphysical abstract concept, you’ll know all the drama and greed that went into it. Ah, things.

 

Feature Image by James Tarbotton Via Unsplash