Everything you learned in school is a lie. But who is behind this grammar conspiracy?

Ending a Sentence with a Preposition and Other Grammar Myths Busted

Originally published on Early Bird Books

“You CANNOT end a sentence with a preposition!” While many of us learned this in grade school, according to English composition expert Jenny Baranick, it’s a big fat lie. And it’s not the only way we’ve been led astray. “We’ve been believing the grammar quacks for years,” says Baranick, author of Kiss My Asterisk, a grammar guide that’s as hilarious and sassy as it is helpful. What are these grammar myths and who is responsible for these common misconceptions? Baranick has some theories. Read on to find out why the wedding industry and other seemingly random interest groups are behind some of the grammar rules you learned in school.

Sometimes when I am standing in front of a classroom full of students, I get drunk.

Not drunk with alcohol, my friends—drunk with power. These students, I think to myself, will believe anything I tell them about grammar because I am their grammar teacher. I could tell them that it’s grammatically incorrect to start a sentence with the word Tuesday between 10 AM and 3 PM on every second Tuesday because of street sweeping. I could tell them that three exclamation points are required after every sentence that includes the word snowman on Christmas Day.

How do I know they’d believe me? Because we’ve been believing grammar quacks for years. Since the eighteenth century, there have been various special interest groups spreading grammar myths to achieve their dubious purposes. And we’ve largely accepted these myths as truth.

However, it’s time to bust these myths open and expose the following special interest groups as the lie-spreading machines that they are:

Latin Lovers: adhering too closely to the rules

“One of these Latin lovers was an eighteenth-century English clergyman named Robert Lowth. His understanding of grammar was based largely on the study of Latin, which would have been fine except for the fact that he decided to carpe diem and write a largely influential English grammar book based on Latin rules. One such rule he propagated was that we must never end a sentence with a preposition.

A preposition is a word that typically indicates time or space. Some that we commonly use to end sentences are at, for, with, from, in, and on.

This is a sentence that ends in a preposition:

I left my door unlocked so Don Juan could sneak in.

Latin Lovers might suggest that we rewrite it like this:

I left my door unlocked so in Don Juan could sneak.

I don’t know about you, but if someone said that to me, I’d kind of want to punch them in their pretentious little mouth.

Not only can rearranging our sentences to avoid ending them in prepositions sound pretentious, it’s also unnecessary. Grammar experts agree that it’s perfectly acceptable to end sentences in prepositions.

It is, however, grammatically incorrect to end a sentence with a preposition if the preposition is unnecessary.

In the example above, we needed the preposition because without it the sentence wouldn’t make sense:

I left my door unlocked so Don Juan can sneak.

However, in the following sentence, the preposition is unnecessary:

When Don Juan left, he asked, “Do you know where I left my sword at?”

If we leave off the at, the sentence still makes sense:

When Don Juan left, he asked, “Do you know where I left my sword?”

So Don Juan’s use of the preposition was wrong.

But English is his second language, so be easy on him. He’s learning.


The Wedding Industry: overdoing formality

Marriages are declining drastically in the United States. I blame Kim Kardashian. If she can’t maintain a marriage for over seventy-two hours, what hope in hell do the rest of us have? However, studies show a different reason: today, it’s socially acceptable to live with someone without being married.

This is bad news for the wedding industry. If this trend continues, how are the wedding planners, cake makers, penis-shaped paraphernalia businesses, and divorce lawyers going to survive?”

The wedding industry has a vested interest in making sure that we value formal relationships (marriages) over informal relationships (dating), which leads me to my theory: the wedding industry, in a desperate attempt to promote the value of formality over informality, has spread the grammar myth that it’s incorrect to start a sentence with the words and or but.

I’m not just a crazy conspiracy theorist. Hear me out:

Sentences, much like couples, have ways to demonstrate their relationship statuses. Couples use engagement and wedding rings; sentences use transitional words and phrases.

Here are some common transitional words and phrases:

for example, therefore, however, consequently, moreover, furthermore

By beginning a sentence with a transitional word, the sentence is telling the world about its relationship with the sentence that it follows.

For example, if a sentence begins with the word furthermore, it’s letting everyone know that it is giving additional information about what was said in the previous sentence:

I must have swans at my wedding. Furthermore, I would like doves.

If a sentence starts with the word however, its relationship will be “in spite of” what was stated in the previous sentence:

Doves will break our budget. However, I think they’re worth it.

I love transitional words and phrases like the ones listed above. I use them all the time, and I highly recommend you use them too. But there are times when I find those particular words a tad too formal for the writing style I am trying to achieve, and that’s when I like to start my sentences with the more informal transitional words and and but.

If we don’t have a wedding and just move in together, we will save thousands of dollars. And we will save on rent.

My parents think that we should get married. But I think that marriage is just a contract.

The good news is that, despite what the wedding industry would have you believe, it’s grammatically acceptable to create less formal relationships between sentences by beginning them with and and but.

Swans, however, are a must!


Teenagers: because what?

If the following exchanges sound familiar to you, you’ll understand why teenagers started the rumor that it’s wrong to start a sentence with the word because:

Teen: Dad, can I go to a concert tonight with my friends?

Dad: No, you have to finish your homework.

Teen: I’m done with my homework.

Dad: It’s a school night.

Teen: It’s Friday.

Dad: Concerts are dangerous.

Teen: This one is at my friend’s church.

Dad: Will there be adults there?

Teen: It will be mostly adults.

Dad: You can’t go.

Teen: Why not?

Dad: Because I said so.

Obviously, teens have spread this rumor in an attempt to prevent their parents from uttering the most frustrating combination of words in the entire world: because I said so.

Although sentences can start with the word because, the teens are right about one thing: because I said so is not a complete sentence. When we start sentences with the word because, there is the tendency to incorrectly form incomplete sentences. Here’s an example:

I had to stay home on Friday night. Because my lame dad wouldn’t let me go to the concert. My friends all think I am a total dork.

Because my lame dad wouldn’t let me go to the concert is not a complete sentence. However, if we connect it to the sentence that follows it, it is:

Because my lame dad wouldn’t let me go to the concert, my friends all think I am a total dork.

When a sentence starts with the word because, it will be the kind of sentence that we talked about in the comma chapter on page 51. It will have the following structure:

Introductory phrase, complete sentence.

So, teens, let’s compromise. Instead of spreading the myth that we can NEVER start a sentence with the word because, let’s say that because will never start a sentence when it doesn’t begin an introductory phrase that is followed by a comma and a complete sentence.

It’s a win/win. I get to promote grammatical correctness and because I said so is still grammatically incorrect.


Health Freaks: pushing wellness.

When these people are offered a cookie, they don’t automatically stuff it in their mouth; they decline it based on its caloric and saturated fat content. When these people are offered a shot of tequila, they don’t down it in one gulp and ask for another; they decline it based on the fact that alcohol is bad for the liver. When these people wake up on Sunday morning, they don’t head to the nearest bacon and pancake outlet; they head to the gym. These health freaks must be the ones who started the false rumor that it’s grammatically incorrect to answer the question “how are you?” with “good” instead of “well.”

I don’t think they did it maliciously. It’s just that to these people health is the only thing that matters. So when someone asks them how they are, they simply assume that the person is inquiring about the state of their health. Consequently, they answer “I’m well.”

When used to describe ourselves, well means in good health. And it’s perfectly acceptable to answer a “how are you?” with an “I’m well.” However, it’s also perfectly acceptable to give an answer that reflects your overall state of being, and, therefore, “good” is also acceptable. If we answer, “I am good,” it means we’re not terrible, but we’re not fantastic.

But we will be fantastic after that cookie, tequila, and bacon!

Congratulations! You are now part of the Right Club. You now know that you are perfectly in the right to express yourself in ways that others have tried to convince you are wrong. The first rule of Right Club, however, is that not everyone knows about the Right Club. This means that even though you know you are right other people may still believe these myths and think you are wrong. These other people may include your bosses, teachers, and clients. So until these grammatical truths become common knowledge, when your boss asks how you are, perhaps you want to answer as though he or she is inquiring after your health.

Featured image courtesy of Photos Public Domain.